View Article

  • Hydrogels in Skin Tissue Engineering: Future Developments and Applications

  • Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Sciences Technology And Advanced Studies (VISTAS) Pallavaram -600117 Chennai, Tamilnadu

Abstract

The skin tissue engineering that can help to pass the challenge of conventional wound healing. The human skin, which is made up of the epidermis, the dermis and the hypodermis, is an important protective layer, and in extreme cases of burns and other chronic wounds, its healing capacity surpasses its natural ability. Hydrogels are cross-linked polymer networks that are highly utilized because of their high water concentrations, biocompatibility and the resemblance to the extracellular matrix. They sustain cell attachment, growth and differentiation and have the ability to deliver bioactive molecules in controlled way to facilitate regeneration. Having four stages, including hemostasis,inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling, wound healing is controlled by growth factors, including PDGF, FGF, VEGF, and EGF. These factors are sustained by hydrogels, which induce angiogenesis, collagen formation, and re-epithelialization. Scaffolds with the desired mechanical and biological characteristics are designed using both natural and synthetic polymers. Also, bioactive molecules and stem cells are important in enhancing skin regeneration. Although this has improved, there are still issues such as stability, biodegradability, immune response and clinical scalability. Generally, the use of hydrogel-based scaffolds has a very good potential to provide an effective platform to skin tissue regeneration.

Keywords

Scaffolds, Proliferation, Regenernation

Introduction

The skin is the biggest organ of the human body which is characterized by three parts that are connected (1). The layers are placed in layers, epidermis, dermis and hypodermis respectively one layer being laid over another most distinct layer to the nearest layer (2). The evolution of hydrogel-based skin tissue engineering has been fascinating since the 19th and early 20th centuries when hydrogel has been characterized as colloidal gel of inorganic salts, and       subsequently as polymeric biomaterials such as poly(vinyl alcohol) (Ivalon) to serve as biomedical implants. The rapid growth of hydrogel research, especially since the 1970s, has led to the development of chemically crosslinked polymers designed to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) of natural skin and exhibiting excellent water affinity, biocompatibility, and elasticity (3). The process of skin regeneration and repair is a complex biological process that deals with restoration and replacement of damaged or lost skin tissues after injury (4). Skin regeneration is the overall process of the restoration of damaged tissue and skin repair is the restoration of the tissue that is already there with much scarring whereas skin repair is the restoration of the structural functionality of the tissue, which is usually left as scar tissue because of the new collagen structure deposited by fibroblasts during the process of skin repair (5). It starts immediately after injury leading to an inflammatory response, which is characterized by vasoconstriction, platelet activation and the formation of a fibrin clot to contain blood and reduce the risk of infection, and then platelets move in with white blood cells and phagocytosis of cellular debris (6). During the proliferative stage, the fibroblasts move to the wound contributing to collagen and extracellular matrix that strengthen the wound, promote angiogenesis to supply oxygen, and direct epithelial cells to re-establish the protective barrier of the skin (7,8). Each year a number of individuals across the world get injury or skin defects surgical interventions in the treatment and management. Although a number of strategies are available. It promote skin wound healing, all of those methods did not. imitate the surfaces of the extracellular matrix (9). The stratum corneum (SC) is the primary component of the physical barrier, although other significant components are the nucleated epidermis and its cell junction and the cytoskeleton proteins. The chemical/biochemical (antimicrobial, innate immunity) block is made up of lipids, acids, hydrolytic enzymes, antimicrobial peptides and macrophages (10). Humoral and cellular components of the immune system make up the (adaptive) immunological barrier the tissue engineering has recently made available the capability to repair the tissue defects, which the body cannot repair (11). Tissue engineering is a novelty in the medicine industry, the method which ensures the regeneration of injured tissue, in addition, other natural TE has also employed polymers like alginate, cellulose and chitosan (12).  There is promising evidence with the use of the above natural polymers despite the challenges faced, there are also several disadvantages of these materials such as high cost, unfavourable mechanical properties.(12)A Synthetic and natural biomaterials play a pivotal role by supporting the extracellular matrix and regenernation studies are now concerned with creating the scaffolds out of polymeric substances that blend with the bio-molecules or cells, which enhance tissue regeneration scaffolding solutions to tissue regeneration applications to batch variation, which make them hard to apply on clinical(1) . Applications  Synthesized polymers on the other hand include polylactic acid (PLA) polyurethane (PU), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and polycaprolactones (PCL) ,there disadvantages of these materials is high or low inflammation may cause skin damage or irritation Topical hydrogel scaffold can be developed via physical and chemical cross linking techniques physical cross linking and chemical cross were linking topical hydrogel are formed by weak van der- wal forces whereas chemical cross linking by covalent bonds have been used extensively in TE because they have good mechanical properties and degradation rates .Nevertheless, most of the degradation products of these polymers are made of acidic compounds, which are damaging to the body and may lead to unwanted immune reaction.  The most significant role of the good protective barrier between the interiors and the externals of the organism. These include the physical, the chemical/biochemical (antimicrobial, innate immunity) and the adaptive immunological barriers, all of which constitute the epidermis (14) .

2. Goal of achieving effective skin tissue regeneration and repair                                                       

Effective healing and a full simulation of physiological skin with nearly native mechanical qualities and no host toxicity or immunological rejection are key objectives of skin Furthermore, repair of the skin's anatomy must include the restoration of skin pigmentation in addition to structural architecture rehabilitation. adnexa, vascular plexus, and nerve. The genotype of the trans, the biocompatibility of the materials utilized, and planted skin cells must all be taken into account while designing skin substitutes the intricacy of production and storage problems (15). In skin TE, maintaining an intact barrier and preventing infection are crucial, particularly when treating severe burns. In the case of chronic wounds, promoting wound healing is another crucial goal.  Numerous efforts have been embraced to engineer a three-dimensional scaffold, which will bear and   induce new tissue of varying cells. Restoration of skin structure must transcend recovery of structure. architectural pattern comprising of renewal of skin pigmentation, vascular plexus, nerve, and adnexa. The construction of skin substitutes also should be taken into consideration the genotype of the material to be used should be transplanted skin cells biocompatible and the complexity of fabrication and provision of storage problems. The restoration of an intact prevention and barrier of sepsis is very important in skin TE especially with the management of large burns. The skin substitute should retard effusion, infection, scarring and contraction. (16)

3. Hydrogel based scafflods in skin regeneration.

The 3D cross-linked polymeric networks are known as hydrogels. which is able to absorb and hold water molecules. However, the hydrophilic was blocked by the cross-linked networks. polymeric chains do not convert to an aqueous phase. in the hydrogel scaffolds (17) . The porosity of the hydrogel scaffold has a great role in diffusion of the nutrients and oxygen molecules among others are macromolecules and in case of absent functioning of blood vessels.  Hydrogels showed with higher viscosity, pore size proved recent advances include the development of multifunctional hydrogels with improved mechanical strength, controlled drug release, and enhanced biological activity, using techniques like loading with nanoparticles or integrating bioactive molecules. Despite these promising developments, challenges remain in optimizing the mechanical properties, porosity, biodegradability, and functionality of hydrogels to closely match native skin tissue and to accelerate effective skin repair and wound management (18). Toft be productive with cellular growth (i.e., Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes) and extra-cellular matrix regeneration recent advances include the development of multifunctional hydrogels with improved mechanical strength, controlled drug release, and enhanced biological activity, using techniques like loading with nanoparticles or integrating bioactive molecules (19). Despite these promising developments, challenges remain in optimizing the mechanical properties, porosity, biodegradability, and functionality of hydrogels to closely match native skin tissue and to accelerate effective skin repair and wound management .Lastly, it seems that the integration of The proliferation of cells into the polymeric hydrogel scaffolds tends to be boosted(20) .Bioactive molecules can induce stem cells to differentiate into skin cell types like keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and hair follicle stem cells, which are crucial for skin repair and regeneration . These molecules regulate cellular processes such as dedifferentiation, proliferation, and migration, enhancing wound healing by activating the endogenous repair mechanisms in the skin (21).   Polymeric scaffolds and in particular hydrogel are very popular because of their biocompatibility, biodegradability and biomimetic characteristics. Hydrogels offer a hydrated condition that is conducive to healing wounds and is porous in nature that facilitates the diffusion of nutrients and oxygen crucial in cell survival and tissue regeneration (22).  Porosity of hydrogel scaffolds with high moisture abortion capacity and superior moisture absorption had been vastly developed in the past. their application towards skin tissue engineering and regeneration (23). The major benefit of hydrogels over gels is that they are stable because of the cross-linked polymeric network that allows them to be easily handled during wound care. In comparison, gels have very loose structure that does not permit them to be fully removed out of the wound, which can cause wound infection. Compared to other systems, hydrogels have tremendous benefits including incorporation of bioactive agents and/or cells since processing conditions are mild. The bioactive molecules that are incorporated can then be administered in a more protracted form which is a huge plus as compared to their application topically (24). Although appropriate synthetic and natural polymers are available, a guarantee of controlled therapeutic release, be it by physical restriction or affinity between drug and material, is a daunting challenge. The development of polymer science has resulted in the development of biopolymers providing a biodegradable and biocompatible skeleton of hydrogels to enhance their use in targeted and efficient delivery of drugs. Nevertheless, reaching the necessary mechanical stability, biodegradability, and target selectivity and maintaining the safety and effectiveness of the physiological environment outline the current difficulty of hydrogel-based drug delivery systems design (25). Hybrid or semi-synthetic hydrogels are typically favored since they provide the benefits of a synthetic and natural polymer. Bioactivity and mechanical capacity. The hydrogel which is formed after a combination of natural proteins or polymers with synthetic polymeric materials offers bioactivity and mechanical properties. Development of the hydrogel on the basis of proteins and polyethylene glycol as the method of encapsulation of dorsal root ganglion cells. In addition, synthetic polymers can be tuned in terms of chemical and physical properties, and with greater reproducibility than natural hydrogels. (26)

4. Polymer networks for advanced skin tissue regeneration

Polymer-based skin tissue engineering involves using both natural and synthetic polymeric biomaterials to fabricate scaffolds that support skin tissue regeneration by promoting cellular functions such as angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, and collagen synthesis (27) .These polymer scaffolds often take the form of hydrogels due to their biocompatibility, moisture retention, and structural Natural polymers, such as collagen, chitosan, gelatin,  biodegradability, and similarity to the native extracellular matrix (ECM). They promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, which are crucial for skin regeneration similarity to the skin extracellular matrix, providing a conducive environment for tissue repair   skin tissue engineering is a promising field aimed at regenerating damaged skin by creating biomimetic scaffolds using natural polymers. Natural polymers, such as collagen, chitosan, gelatin, biodegradability, and similarity to the native extracellular matrix (ECM). They promote cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, which are crucial for skin (28)

Table 1: Natural polymers and their applications

Polymer

Source/ composition

Key role in skin regeneration

Examples of application

chitosan

Derived from chitin in crusatacean shells

Antimicrobial enhances wound contraction hemostatic

Blended with alignate gelation in wound dressings (29)

Collagen

Structural protein from animal tissues

Promotes cell adhesion, growth and wound healing

Collagen-based hydrogel skin graft scaffolds (30)

Gelatin

Denatured collagen

Biodegradable scaffold for fibroblast

Hydrogel matrices for dermal regeneration. (31)

Hyaluronic acid

Natural polysaccharide

Enhances hydration promotes angiogensis

Injectables hydrogel, wound fillers (32)

Synthetic polymer:

Table no :2 Synthetic polymer and their applications

Polymer

Chemical type

Key role in skin Regeneration

Examples of application

Poly (latic acid)

Aliphatic polyester

Biodegradable scaffold, supports tissue formation

Electrospum PlA nanofibres for dermal matrices (33)

Poly glycolic acid)

Aliphatic polyester

Fast-degrading scaffolds promoting tissue infiltration

PGA meshes for dermal repair (34)

Poly (lactic -co -glycolic acid)

Copolymer

Controlled degradation and drug delivery

PLGA nanoparticles for growth factor delivery. (35)

Polyethylene glycol

Hydrophilic polymer

Non- toxic forms hydrogel, supports for cells encapsulation

PEG-Based crosslinks hydrogel for skin regeneration (36)

Polycaprolactone(pcl)

Semic crystalline polyester

Slow degradation, supports long term regeneration

Nanofibres composites for skin scaffolds (37)

5. Cellular bioactive molecules and the therapeutic delivery.

Keratinocytes represent the major protective layer of the skin and play a crucial role in the maintenance of skin barrier integrity. (38) In wound healing, this cell type is responsible for reepithelialization, an active process that consists of the coordinated proliferation, migration, and stratification of cells(39). When this mechanism fails, it gives rise to serious complications, including dehydration, microbial invasion, and chronic non-healable wounds, sometimes ending with the death of the organism. Therefore, rapid and efficient reepithelialization is regarded as a key target in skin regenerative therapies (40). Clinically, keratinocytes are often needed as cell sheets or part of an engineered skin substitute to reconstruct lost epithelium. The availability of keratinocytes, however, is limited since patient-derived keratinocyte harvesting can be invasive, of low yield, and unsuitable for large or deep wounds. Therefore, the search for alternative and expandable cell sources has become one of the important research goals in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering (41). One promising approach would be the use of bioactive small molecules to guide cells toward a keratinocyte identity. These molecules modulate cellular signaling pathways and transcriptional programs to promote keratinocyte lineage commitment in the absence of genetic manipulation (42). Most earlier efforts relied on viral vector-driven transgene expression, which carries risks of insertional mutagenesis and spatiotemporally unpredictable gene reactivation that limit therapeutic translation (43). By comparison, small-molecule-based reprogramming represents a non-integrative, reversible, and clinically safer method (44). Recent studies have identified that the combinatorial application of bioactive molecules effectively promotes the differentiation of ESCs and iPSCs into keratinocytes. These bioactive molecules are usually developmental stage-specific regulators. These molecules mimic developmental cues through modulation of pathways that regulate ectodermal specification. Selection of effective molecules depends on a detailed understanding of epidermal development and molecular signaling networks, along with lineage determinants (45). The epidermis develops during normal skin development from the primitive ectoderm, which expresses K8/K18. These markers are gradually substituted by K5/K14, representing the basal keratinocyte phenotype as the cells commit to the keratinocyte lineage. Subsequent stratification leads to terminal differentiation and formation of the mature epidermis, which expresses K1/K10(46). The decision of the primitive ectoderm to assume either an epidermal or a neural fate is controlled by cross-talk between Wnt BMP, and FGF signaling events (47). In early ectoderm, active Wnt signaling maintains the epidermal option, increases sensitivity to BMP signals, and concurrently suppresses neural induction mediated by FGFs. In the absence of Wnt activity, the influence of FGF signaling becomes dominant, driving the ectoderm toward a neural lineage (48). A powerful downstream driver of epidermal development is p63, specifically the ΔNp63 isoform, which has become absolutely essential for basal layer formation and maintenance of keratinocyte layers (49). BMP directs ΔNp63 transcription through SMAD4/5, ensuring epidermal commitment while repressing neural differentiation. ΔNp63 itself drives the expression of other keratin genes such as K14 and reinforces the cell identity of keratinocytes. These developmental pathways become targets for the bioactive molecules that can mimic this signaling environment required for keratinocyte specification. Such molecule-driven reprogramming is a highly appealing route for generating large numbers of transplantable keratinocytes for use in wound healing (49).

6. Role of growth factors in regenerative design

A lot of different types of cells release growth factors that send signals to start certain developmental programs that control Cell migration, differentiation, and prolieration Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), hepatocyte growth factor, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) are powerful mitogens that make cells grow. Nerve growth factor (NGF), on the other hand, makes cells migration and neurites extension All of these cellular events are important for tissues to grow (50).

Table no: 3 Growth factors parameters

Growth factors

Major biological function

Tissue engineering application

Application in wound skin Regeneration

Platelet -Derived growth factor (PDGF)

Regulates cell growth and ECM formation

Promotes fibroblast migration and proliferation

Enhances granulation tissue formation (51)

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)

Ehnaces cell dermal repair

Stimulates fibroblast proliferation angiogenesis

It promotes collagen synthesis and tissue regeneration (52)

Vascular endothelical growth factor (VEGF)

Promotes angiogenesis

Stimulates endothelical proliferation

It improve blood vessel formation in damaged tissue (41,53)

Epidermal growth factor (EGF)

Stimulates epidermal regeneration

Promotes keratinocycte proliferation

Accelerates wound closure and re-epithelialization (54)

7. Regenerating skin through stem cell technology

Hair bulge, a particular region of the hair follicle, and the hair germ, a collection of cells beneath it, contain a significant amount of these stem cells (55). Stem cells can move from this site to the basal layer of the interfollicular epidermis, the sebaceous gland, and the hair follicle matrix (56). There, they mature into precursor cells that eventually give rise to epidermal, glandular, or hair cells. The isthmus and infundibulum, which connect the hair canal to the skin's surface, are part of the upper segment of the hair follicle, which stays constant (57) . In contrast, the lower segment is temporary and cycles through growth (anagen), regression (catagen), and rest (telogen) phases. Follicular stem cells contribute to initiating new hair growth cycles and regenerating hair follicles. Because stem cells can differentiate into different tissue types through asymmetric replication, they could aid in the creation of skin components that are absent from tissue-engineered skin substitutes. (57,58)

Figure no: 1 Stem cells in skin tissue engineering

Two characteristics set stem cells apart: i) They are undifferentiated cells that divide to renew themselves throughout an organism's life, and ii) they have the amazing ability to differentiate into several cell types with distinct roles from a common precursor (59). Adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) are some of the primary cell sources that could be utilized for skin regeneration and repair. (60)

8. Fibroblasts cells: The Major Regulators of Skin Tissues Repair.

It was already well know how to culture fibroblasts before Rheinwald and Green found a way to culture and expand keratinocytes in 1975. These cells need murine 3T3 fibroblast cells that have stopped growing to help them grow Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and FGF are key players in the regulation of this process, which involves a number of factors (61) Stimulation of the bone marrow and endothelial progenitors at normal oxygen levels causes angiogenesis (62). In the last stage, fibroblasts stimulated by macrophages around a wound or in bone marrow transform into myofibroblasts. Recognized as contractile cells, myofibroblasts play a remarkable role in wound closure (63). Both myoblasts and fibroblasts produce and deposit extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, mostly collagen, which eventually form scars (64). Maintaining the equilibrium between ECM protein deposition and degradation is crucial because distortion of this process leads to abnormal scarring or explant culture, the latter being especially effective for procuring cells from smaller specimens. (64) Fetal calf serum is often added to the medium used to grow fibroblasts. The growth parameters and characteristics of fibroblasts in culture are affected by the passage number, donor age, fibroblast subtype (reticular or papillary dermis), and anatomical site (65). Older donor skin fibroblasts, in contrast to their younger counterparts, exhibit slower migration, attain cellular senescence sooner, and possess an extended cell population doubling time (64,65). Additionally, fibroblasts from older donors exhibit reduced responsiveness to growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, dexamethasone, insulin, and transfer When growth factors and cytokines like TGF-β1.15 are released, fibroblasts move into and multiply in injury sites (66). Fibroblasts deposit collagen and other pertinent substances to heal the wound. ECM elements nowadays, a lot of ES products rely on either cultured allogenic neonatal fibroblasts or autologous fibroblasts in order to produce them. Fibrocytes are found systemically in the bloodstream and bone marrow, but keratinocytes and fibroblasts can be extracted from local skin tissue. Since then, a number of studies have documented peripheral mononuclear cells differentiating into fibroblast-like cells (67). Additionally, fibroblasts from older donors exhibit reduced responsiveness to growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, dexamethasone, insulin, and transferrin in vitro. Older donor skin fibroblasts, in contrast to their younger counterparts, exhibit slower migration, attain cellular senescence sooner, and possess an extended cell population doubling time (68). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and FGF are key players in the regulation of this process, which involves a number of factors Furthermore, stimulation of the bone marrow and endothelial progenitors at normal oxygen levels causes angiogenesis. In the last stage, fibroblasts stimulated by macrophages around a wound or in bone marrow transform into myofibroblasts. Recognized as contractile cells, myofibroblasts play a remarkable role in wound closure (69). Both myoblasts and fibroblasts produce and deposit extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, mostly collagen, which eventually form scars. Maintaining the equilibrium between ECM protein deposition and degradation is crucial because distortion of this process leads to abnormal scarring (70). Gene expression patterns (e.g., cell-cell signalling, matrix remodelling) show a variety of fibroblasts of various locations in the body, a phenomenon that supports the notion of fibroblast topographical heterogeneity. Thus, both age and anatomical location of human dermal fibroblasts have been reported to influence the differences in functionality e.g. to induce epidermal differentiation and to assist in wound healing (71). In fact, dermal fibroblasts of the identical topographic locations though separated into various individuals are more similar to each other as compared to the dermal fibroblasts of various regions, yet in the same subject. Passages in cell culture fail to alter this anatomical imprinting, or do so to a minimal extent. Environmental changes do not alter the anatomical imprinting either (72).

Figure no: 2 Fibroblast cells in wound healing

9. Advanced bioprinting strategies for skin repair and reconstruction

Additionally, fibroblasts from older donors exhibit reduced responsiveness to growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, dexamethasone, insulin, and transferrin in vitro. Tissue engineering is very important for making skin equivalents that can be used to treat chronic wounds and especially burn wounds. In fact, there is no cellularized skin equivalent that can adequately replicate native skin (73). We used a laser-assisted bioprinting (LaBP) method to make a skin substitute that is fully cellularized. LaBP's most unique feature different types of cells in a precise three-dimensional (3D) spatial pattern. To make the skin substitutes, we put fibroblasts and keratinocytes on top of a stabilizing matrix called MatridermH (74). Later, these skin constructs were tested in living animals using the dorsal skin fold chamber in nude mice. The transplants were put into full-thickness skin wounds, and when they were taken out after 11 days, they were fully connected to the tissue around them (74,75).

Figure no: 3 Bioprinting in skin tissue engineering

The printed keratinocytes created a multi-layered epidermis with the start of differentiation and a stratum corneum. The keratinocytes proliferated predominantly in the suprabasal layers. In vitro controls, cultivated at the air-liquid interface, also displayed proliferative cells, albeit distributed throughout the entire epidermis. E-cadherin serves as an indicator for adherens junctions and consequently tissue formation, observable in both in vivo and in vitro epidermis (76). In both scenarios, the printed fibroblasts partially remained atop the underlying MatridermH, synthesizing collagen, while a portion migrated into the MatridermH. Some blood vessels in the mice could be seen growing from the wound bed and the edges of the wound toward the printed cells. In conclusion, we demonstrated the successful 3D printing of a cellular construct using LaBP, followed by subsequent tissue formation in vivo (77). These findings constitute the essential foundation for the development of complex tissues, such as skin, composed of various cell types arranged in a sophisticated three-dimensional configuration (78)

10. Challenges involved in skin regeneration

Challenges recent years, the field of stem cell biology has developed considerably and presents huge potential for using human originated adult or embryonic stem cells as sources for in vitro generation of tissues (79). Endothelial cells derived from human embryonic stem cells have been shown to generate functional vasculature However, much more research is required to understand the cues and signals that regulate cell differentiation. In addition, research is required in scaling up these cells and using them for tissue engineering applications (80)

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future treatments for wound healing and tissue regeneration may benefit from tissue-engineered skin substitutes. To extend their lifespan and improve their integration with host tissues, these substitutes' vascularization still needs to be improved (81). One approach of improving vascularization is by employing bioreactors to give mechanical stimulation essential to generate mature blood vessels. Standardizing the production process and cutting manufacturing costs will be crucial steps in creating dependable replacements. To increase their lifespans, standardization in storage and preservation is also crucial (82).

CONCLUSION:

The field of skin tissue engineering is a fast-growing and one of the most promising approaches to recreating and repairing the injured skin. Combination of hydrogel scaffolds, polymeric biomaterials, bioactive molecules, stem cells and subsequent bioprinting methods has greatly enhanced capability to mimic native extracellular matrix as well as the support of key biological processes cell adhesion, cell proliferation, angiogenesis and re-epithelialization. In particular, hydrogel offers a moist and biocompatible platform to aid tissue regeneration and controlled drug or growth factor delivery. Mechanical strength, biodegradability and biological performance can be optimised by the synergistic exploitation of natural and synthetic polymers. Moreover, bioactive molecules and stem cells are useful in improving cellular differentiation and increasing wound healing rates whereas 3D bioprinting technologies allow the accurate spatial organization of various cell types to recapitulate the intricate architecture of native skin with high accuracy. Nevertheless, reproduction of native skin is so difficult even with these developments, particularly in terms of vascularization, re-pigmentation, adnexal regeneration, immune compatibility and lasting functionality. The future studies should be aimed at enhancing the scaffold vascular integration, standardization of the manufacturing and storage processes, cost-effectiveness, and clinical safety and reproducibility. The combination of biomaterial science, cellular biology and tissue engineering technologies is, i(4)n general, a potential that is enormous in the development of clinically viable, fully functional skin substitutes in the treatments of burns, chronic wounds, and wide-ranging skin defects.

REFERENCES

  1. Reddien PW. XLin28: Time for tissue repair. Cell. Elsevier B.V.; 2013. p. 738. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.025 PubMed PMID: 24209612.
  2. Arabpour Z, Abedi F, Salehi M, Baharnoori SM, Soleimani M, Djalilian AR. Hydrogel-Based Skin Regeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2024. doi:10.3390/ijms25041982
  3. Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MWJ. Bioengineering skin using mechanisms of regeneration and repair. Biomaterials. 2007. p. 5100–13. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.031 PubMed PMID: 17688942.
  4. Vacanti C. The history of tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med. 2006 Sep 19;1(3):569–76. doi:10.2755/jcmm010.003.20
  5. Chogan F, Chen Y, Wood F, Jeschke MG. Skin Tissue Engineering Advances in Burns: A Brief Introduction to the Past, the Present, and the Future Potential. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2023 Jan 1;44: S1–4. doi:10.1093/jbcr/irac127 PubMed PMID: 36567473.
  6. Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I, Chiesa E, Pisani S, Conti B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics. MDPI AG; 2020. p. 1–30. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12080735
  7. Samuel ParimalaK, Rupa G. A Study to Assess Level of Job Satisfaction and Subjective Wellbeing of Teaching Faculty Employed in Selected Colleges of Nursing at Pandalam, Pathanamthitta District, Kerala. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2017;7(2):222. doi:10.5958/2349-2996.2017.00045.3
  8. Ridhanya K, Rajakumari. Skin wound healing: An update on the current knowledge and concepts. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology; 2019. p. 1448–52. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00240.3
  9. Mahajan N, Soker S, Murphy SV. Regenerative Medicine Approaches for Skin Wound Healing: from Allografts to Engineered Skin Substitutes. Curr Transplant Rep. 2024 Dec 1;11(4):207–21. doi:10.1007/s40472-024-00453-5
  10. Shevchenko R V., James SL, James SE. A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. Royal Society; 2010. p. 229–58. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0403
  11. Antonio J, Quaresma S. Organization of the Skin Immune System and Compartmentalized Immune Responses in Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2019. doi:10.1128/CMR
  12. O’Brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Today. Elsevier B.V.; 2011. p. 88–95. doi:10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-
  13. Sreeram KJ, Nair BU. Natural polymers in biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2018;135(12):46032.
  14. Elango J, Zamora-Ledezma C, Maté-Sánchez de Val JE. Natural vs Synthetic Polymers: How Do They Communicate with Cells for Skin Regeneration—A Review. Journal of Composites Science. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2023. doi:10.3390/jcs7090385
  15. Kamel RA, Ong JF, Eriksson E, Junker JPE, Caterson EJ. Tissue engineering of skin. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 533–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.027
  16. Kamel RA, Ong JF, Eriksson E, Junker JPE, Caterson EJ. Tissue engineering of skin. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 533–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.027
  17. Jeong KH, Park D, Lee YC. Polymer-based hydrogel scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications: a mini-review. Journal of Polymer Research. Springer Netherlands; 2017. doi:10.1007/s10965-017-1278-4
  18. Jeong KH, Park D, Lee YC. Polymer-based hydrogel scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications: a mini-review. Journal of Polymer Research. Springer Netherlands; 2017. doi:10.1007/s10965-017-1278-4
  19. Shimizu Y, Ntege EH, Sunami H. Current regenerative medicine-based approaches for skin regeneration: A review of literature and a report on clinical applications in Japan. Regenerative Therapy. Japanese Society of Regenerative Medicine; 2022. p. 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2022.05.008
  20. Arabpour Z, Abedi F, Salehi M, Baharnoori SM, Soleimani M, Djalilian AR. Hydrogel-Based Skin Regeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2024. doi:10.3390/ijms25041982
  21. Rezaie F, Momeni-Moghaddam M, Naderi-Meshkin H. Regeneration and Repair of Skin Wounds: Various Strategies for Treatment. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2019. p. 247–61. doi:10.1177/1534734619859214 PubMed PMID: 31257948.
  22. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. International Journal of Polymer Science. Hindawi Limited; 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/290602
  23. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci. 2011; 2011:290602
  24. Da Silva LP, Reis RL, Correlo VM, Marques AP. Hydrogel-Based Strategies to Advance Therapies for skin tissue engineerring
  25. Liu B, Chen K. Advances in Hydrogel-Based Drug Delivery Systems. Gels. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2024. doi:10.3390/gels10040262
  26. Radulescu DM, Neacsu IA, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E. New Insights of Scaffolds Based on Hydrogels in Tissue Engineering. Polymers. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2022. doi:10.3390/polym14040799
  27. Varghese SA, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S, Parameswaranpillai J. Natural polymers and the hydrogels prepared from them. In: Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers. Elsevier; 2019. p. 17–47. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-816421-1.00002-1
  28. Singh MR, Patel S, Singh D. Natural polymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering. In: Nanobiomaterials in Soft Tissue Engineering: Applications of Nanobiomaterials. Elsevier Inc.; 2016. p. 231–60. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-42865-1.00009-X
  29. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E. Chitosan - A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford). Elsevier Ltd; 2011. p. 981–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001
  30. Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2010;3(3):1863–87. doi:10.3390/ma3031863
  31. Han F, Dong Y, Su Z, Yin R, Song A, Li S. Preparation, characteristics and assessment of a novel gelatin-chitosan sponge scaffold as skin tissue engineering material. Int J Pharm. 2014 Dec 10;476(1):124–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.036 PubMed PMID: 25275938.
  32. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Materials. 2011 Mar 25;23(12). doi:10.1002/adma.201003963 PubMed PMID: 21394792.
  33. Castañeda-Rodríguez S, González-Torres M, Ribas-Aparicio RM, Del Prado Audelo ML, Leyva Gómez G, Gürer ES, et al. Recent advances in modified poly (lactic acid) as tissue engineering materials. Journal of Biological Engineering. BioMed Central Ltd; 2023. doi:10.1186/s13036-023-00338-8
  34. Sekiya N, Ichioka S, Terada D, Tsuchiya S, Kobayashi H. Efficacy of a poly glycolic acid (PGA)/collagen composite nanofibre scaffold on cell migration and neovascularisation in vivo skin defect model. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(6):498–502. doi:10.3109/2000656X.2013.788507 PubMed PMID: 23596989.
  35. Ellis MJ, Chaudhuri JB. Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) hollow fibre membranes for use as a tissue engineering scaffold. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jan 1;96(1):177–87. doi:10.1002/bit.21093 PubMed PMID: 16894632.
  36. Vahidi M, Frounchi M, Dadbin S. Porous gelatin/poly (ethylene glycol) scaffolds for skin cells. Soft Mater. 2017 Jan 2;15(1):95–102. doi:10.1080/1539445X.2016.1268623
  37. Janmohammadi M, Nourbakhsh MS. Electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering: a review. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. Taylor and Francis Inc.; 2019. p. 527–39. doi:10.1080/00914037.2018.1466139
  38. Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM. The skin: An indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17(12):1063–72. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008. 00786.x PubMed PMID: 19043850.
  39. Martin P. Wound Healing-Aiming for Perfect Skin Regeneration [Internet]. Report. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/
  40. Green H, Kehinde O, Thomas J. Growth of cultured human epidermal cells into multiple epithelia suitable for grafting. Cell Biology. 1979. Report.
  41. Zhang X, Xu W, Hu X. Tissue-engineered skin regenerative units for epidermal keratinocytes expansion and wound healing. Medical Science Monitor. 2021;27. doi:10.12659/MSM.932978 PubMed PMID: 34923566.
  42. Yamanaka S. Induced pluripotent stem cells: Past, present, and future. Cell Stem Cell. 2012. p. 678–84. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.005 PubMed PMID: 22704507.
  43. Appasani K, Appasani RK. Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine From Molecular Embryology to Tissue Engineering [Internet]. Report. Available from: http://www.springer.com/series/7896
  44. Finch PW, Rubin JS. Keratinocyte growth factor expression and its role in epithelial repair. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91(4):753–761.
  45. Ali G, Abdelalim EM. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into epidermal keratinocyte-like cells. STAR Protoc. 2022 Sep 16;3(3). doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101613 PubMed PMID: 35990735.
  46. Zhang L juan. Keratins in Skin Epidermal Development and Diseases. In: Keratin. IntechOpen; 2018. doi:10.5772/intechopen.79050
  47. Uddin A, Rahmani M, Sajini A. From basic biology to engineered therapies: the keratinocyte stem cell playbook. Frontiers in Medical Technology. Frontiers Media SA; 2026. doi:10.3389/fmedt.2026.1763067
  48. Wodarz A, Nusse R. Mechanisms Of Wnt Signaling In Development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol [Internet]. 1998. Report. Available from: http://www.stanford.edu/
  49. Koster MI. P63 in skin development and ectodermal dysplasias. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Nature Publishing Group; 2010. p. 2352–8. doi:10.1038/jid.2010.119 PubMed PMID: 20445549.
  50. Werner S. Keratinocyte Growth Factor: A Unique Player in Epithelial Repair Processes. Cytokine + Growth Factor Reviews. Report.
  51. Andrae J, Gallini R, Betsholtz C. Role of platelet-derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Genes and Development. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2008. p. 1276–312. doi:10.1101/gad.1653708 PubMed PMID: 18483217.
  52. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. The fibroblast growth factor signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2015 May 1;4(3):215–66. doi:10.1002/wdev.176 PubMed PMID: 25772309.
  53. Kamel RA, Ong JF, Eriksson E, Junker JPE, Caterson EJ. Tissue engineering of skin. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 533–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.027
  54. Savage CR, Hash JH, Cohen S. Epidermal Growth Factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1973 Nov;248(22):7669–72. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(19)43242-0
  55. Randall VA, Botchkareva N V. The Biology of Hair Growth. In: Cosmetic Applications of Laser and Light-Based Systems. Elsevier Inc.; 2009. p. 3–35. doi:10.1016/B978-0-8155-1572-2.50006-3
  56. Watt FM. Tanioku Kihei Memorial Lecture The stem cell compartment in human interfollicular epidermis. Journal of Dermatological Science [Internet]. 2002. Report. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/jdermsci
  57. Blanpain C, Fuchs E. Epidermal homeostasis: A balancing act of stem cells in the skin. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nature Publishing Group; 2009. p. 207–17. doi:10.1038/nrm2636 PubMed PMID: 19209183.
  58. Cotsarelis G. Epithelial stem cells: A folliculocentric view. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Nature Publishing Group; 2006. p. 1459–68. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700376 PubMed PMID: 16778814.
  59. Stem Cells: Units of Development, Review Units of Regeneration, and Units in Evolution. Report.
  60. Cable J, Fuchs E, Weissman I, Jasper H, Glass D, Rando TA, et al. Adult stem cells and regenerative medicine—a symposium report. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2020. p. 27–36. doi:10.1111/nyas.14243 PubMed PMID: 31655007.
  61. Kishimoto T. Interleukin-6: From basic science to medicine - 40 Years in immunology. Annual Review of Immunology. 2005. p. 1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115806 PubMed PMID: 15771564.
  62. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: Basic science and clinical progress. Endocrine Reviews. 2004. p. 581–611. doi:10.1210/er.2003-0027 PubMed PMID: 15294883.
  63. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. Protein family review Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol [Internet]. 2001;2(3). Available from: http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005.1http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005
  64. Rittié L. Cellular mechanisms of skin repair in humans and other mammals. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling. Springer Netherlands; 2016. p. 103–20. doi:10.1007/s12079-016-0330-
  65. Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. Journal of Pathology. 2008. p. 199–210. doi:10.1002/path.2277 PubMed PMID: 18161745.
  66. Werner S. Keratinocyte growth factor: a unique player in epithelial repair processes. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1998;9(2):153–165.
  67. Reilkoff RA, Bucala R, Herzog EL. Fibrocytes: Emerging effector cells in chronic inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011. p. 427–35. doi:10.1038/nri2990 PubMed PMID: 21597472.
  68. Schultz GS, Gary Sibbald ; R, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett ; Caroline, Harding ; Keith, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Report.
  69. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. Protein family review Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol [Internet]. 2001;2(3). Available from: http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005.1http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005
  70. Rittié L. Cellular mechanisms of skin repair in humans and other mammals. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling. Springer Netherlands; 2016. p. 103–20. doi:10.1007/s12079-016-0330-1
  71. Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. Journal of Pathology. 2008. p. 199–210. doi:10.1002/path.2277 PubMed PMID: 18161745.
  72. Barros NR, Kim HJ, Gouidie MJ, Lee KJ, Bandaru P, Banton EA, et al. Biofabrication of endothelial cell, dermal fibroblast, and multilayered keratinocyte layers for skin tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2021 Jul 1;13(3). doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aba503
  73. Koch L, Kuhn S, Sorg H, Gruene M, Schlie S, Gaebel R, et al. Laser Printing of Skin Cells and Human Stem Cells. Report.
  74. Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, Michael S, Gruene M, Coger V, et al. Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Jul;109(7):1855–63. doi:10.1002/bit.24455 PubMed PMID: 22328297.
  75. Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, Michael S, Gruene M, Coger V, et al. Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Jul;109(7):1855–63. doi:10.1002/bit.24455 PubMed PMID: 22328297.
  76. Michael S, Sorg H, Peck CT, Koch L, Deiwick A, Chichkov B, et al. Tissue Engineered Skin Substitutes Created by Laser-Assisted Bioprinting Form Skin-Like Structures in the Dorsal Skin Fold Chamber in Mice. PLoS One. 2013 Mar 4;8(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057741 PubMed PMID: 23469227.
  77. Pereira RF, Sousa A, Barrias CC, Bayat A, Granja PL, Bártolo PJ. Advances in bioprinted cell-laden hydrogels for skin tissue engineering. Biomanufacturing Reviews. 2017 Dec;2(1). doi:10.1007/s40898-017-0003-8
  78. Huang Y, Zhang XF, Gao G, Yonezawa T, Cui X. 3D bioprinting and the current applications in tissue engineering. Biotechnology Journal. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2017. doi:10.1002/biot.201600734 PubMed PMID: 28675678.
  79. Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A. Vascularization and Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static Networks. Trends in Biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. p. 733–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002 PubMed PMID: 27032730.
  80. Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A. Vascularization and Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static Networks. Trends in Biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. p. 733–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002 PubMed PMID: 27032730.
  81. Chaudhari AA, Vig K, Baganizi DR, Sahu R, Dixit S, Dennis V, et al. Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. MDPI AG; 2016. doi:10.3390/ijms17121974 PubMed PMID: 27898014.
  82. Yu JR, Navarro J, Coburn JC, Mahadik B, Molnar J, Holmes JH, et al. Current and Future Perspectives on Skin Tissue Engineering: Key Features of Biomedical Research, Translational Assessment, and Clinical Application. Advanced Healthcare Materials. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2019. doi:10.1002/adhm.201801471 PubMed PMID: 30707508.

Reference

  1. Reddien PW. XLin28: Time for tissue repair. Cell. Elsevier B.V.; 2013. p. 738. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.025 PubMed PMID: 24209612.
  2. Arabpour Z, Abedi F, Salehi M, Baharnoori SM, Soleimani M, Djalilian AR. Hydrogel-Based Skin Regeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2024. doi:10.3390/ijms25041982
  3. Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MWJ. Bioengineering skin using mechanisms of regeneration and repair. Biomaterials. 2007. p. 5100–13. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.031 PubMed PMID: 17688942.
  4. Vacanti C. The history of tissue engineering. J Cell Mol Med. 2006 Sep 19;1(3):569–76. doi:10.2755/jcmm010.003.20
  5. Chogan F, Chen Y, Wood F, Jeschke MG. Skin Tissue Engineering Advances in Burns: A Brief Introduction to the Past, the Present, and the Future Potential. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2023 Jan 1;44: S1–4. doi:10.1093/jbcr/irac127 PubMed PMID: 36567473.
  6. Tottoli EM, Dorati R, Genta I, Chiesa E, Pisani S, Conti B. Skin wound healing process and new emerging technologies for skin wound care and regeneration. Pharmaceutics. MDPI AG; 2020. p. 1–30. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12080735
  7. Samuel ParimalaK, Rupa G. A Study to Assess Level of Job Satisfaction and Subjective Wellbeing of Teaching Faculty Employed in Selected Colleges of Nursing at Pandalam, Pathanamthitta District, Kerala. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2017;7(2):222. doi:10.5958/2349-2996.2017.00045.3
  8. Ridhanya K, Rajakumari. Skin wound healing: An update on the current knowledge and concepts. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology; 2019. p. 1448–52. doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00240.3
  9. Mahajan N, Soker S, Murphy SV. Regenerative Medicine Approaches for Skin Wound Healing: from Allografts to Engineered Skin Substitutes. Curr Transplant Rep. 2024 Dec 1;11(4):207–21. doi:10.1007/s40472-024-00453-5
  10. Shevchenko R V., James SL, James SE. A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. Royal Society; 2010. p. 229–58. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0403
  11. Antonio J, Quaresma S. Organization of the Skin Immune System and Compartmentalized Immune Responses in Infectious Diseases [Internet]. 2019. doi:10.1128/CMR
  12. O’Brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Materials Today. Elsevier B.V.; 2011. p. 88–95. doi:10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-
  13. Sreeram KJ, Nair BU. Natural polymers in biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2018;135(12):46032.
  14. Elango J, Zamora-Ledezma C, Maté-Sánchez de Val JE. Natural vs Synthetic Polymers: How Do They Communicate with Cells for Skin Regeneration—A Review. Journal of Composites Science. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2023. doi:10.3390/jcs7090385
  15. Kamel RA, Ong JF, Eriksson E, Junker JPE, Caterson EJ. Tissue engineering of skin. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 533–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.027
  16. Kamel RA, Ong JF, Eriksson E, Junker JPE, Caterson EJ. Tissue engineering of skin. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 533–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.027
  17. Jeong KH, Park D, Lee YC. Polymer-based hydrogel scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications: a mini-review. Journal of Polymer Research. Springer Netherlands; 2017. doi:10.1007/s10965-017-1278-4
  18. Jeong KH, Park D, Lee YC. Polymer-based hydrogel scaffolds for skin tissue engineering applications: a mini-review. Journal of Polymer Research. Springer Netherlands; 2017. doi:10.1007/s10965-017-1278-4
  19. Shimizu Y, Ntege EH, Sunami H. Current regenerative medicine-based approaches for skin regeneration: A review of literature and a report on clinical applications in Japan. Regenerative Therapy. Japanese Society of Regenerative Medicine; 2022. p. 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2022.05.008
  20. Arabpour Z, Abedi F, Salehi M, Baharnoori SM, Soleimani M, Djalilian AR. Hydrogel-Based Skin Regeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2024. doi:10.3390/ijms25041982
  21. Rezaie F, Momeni-Moghaddam M, Naderi-Meshkin H. Regeneration and Repair of Skin Wounds: Various Strategies for Treatment. International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2019. p. 247–61. doi:10.1177/1534734619859214 PubMed PMID: 31257948.
  22. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. International Journal of Polymer Science. Hindawi Limited; 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/290602
  23. Dhandayuthapani B, Yoshida Y, Maekawa T, Kumar DS. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. Int J Polym Sci. 2011; 2011:290602
  24. Da Silva LP, Reis RL, Correlo VM, Marques AP. Hydrogel-Based Strategies to Advance Therapies for skin tissue engineerring
  25. Liu B, Chen K. Advances in Hydrogel-Based Drug Delivery Systems. Gels. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2024. doi:10.3390/gels10040262
  26. Radulescu DM, Neacsu IA, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E. New Insights of Scaffolds Based on Hydrogels in Tissue Engineering. Polymers. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI); 2022. doi:10.3390/polym14040799
  27. Varghese SA, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S, Parameswaranpillai J. Natural polymers and the hydrogels prepared from them. In: Hydrogels Based on Natural Polymers. Elsevier; 2019. p. 17–47. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-816421-1.00002-1
  28. Singh MR, Patel S, Singh D. Natural polymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering. In: Nanobiomaterials in Soft Tissue Engineering: Applications of Nanobiomaterials. Elsevier Inc.; 2016. p. 231–60. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-42865-1.00009-X
  29. Dash M, Chiellini F, Ottenbrite RM, Chiellini E. Chitosan - A versatile semi-synthetic polymer in biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford). Elsevier Ltd; 2011. p. 981–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.001
  30. Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2010;3(3):1863–87. doi:10.3390/ma3031863
  31. Han F, Dong Y, Su Z, Yin R, Song A, Li S. Preparation, characteristics and assessment of a novel gelatin-chitosan sponge scaffold as skin tissue engineering material. Int J Pharm. 2014 Dec 10;476(1):124–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.09.036 PubMed PMID: 25275938.
  32. Burdick JA, Prestwich GD. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Advanced Materials. 2011 Mar 25;23(12). doi:10.1002/adma.201003963 PubMed PMID: 21394792.
  33. Castañeda-Rodríguez S, González-Torres M, Ribas-Aparicio RM, Del Prado Audelo ML, Leyva Gómez G, Gürer ES, et al. Recent advances in modified poly (lactic acid) as tissue engineering materials. Journal of Biological Engineering. BioMed Central Ltd; 2023. doi:10.1186/s13036-023-00338-8
  34. Sekiya N, Ichioka S, Terada D, Tsuchiya S, Kobayashi H. Efficacy of a poly glycolic acid (PGA)/collagen composite nanofibre scaffold on cell migration and neovascularisation in vivo skin defect model. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(6):498–502. doi:10.3109/2000656X.2013.788507 PubMed PMID: 23596989.
  35. Ellis MJ, Chaudhuri JB. Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) hollow fibre membranes for use as a tissue engineering scaffold. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Jan 1;96(1):177–87. doi:10.1002/bit.21093 PubMed PMID: 16894632.
  36. Vahidi M, Frounchi M, Dadbin S. Porous gelatin/poly (ethylene glycol) scaffolds for skin cells. Soft Mater. 2017 Jan 2;15(1):95–102. doi:10.1080/1539445X.2016.1268623
  37. Janmohammadi M, Nourbakhsh MS. Electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering: a review. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. Taylor and Francis Inc.; 2019. p. 527–39. doi:10.1080/00914037.2018.1466139
  38. Proksch E, Brandner JM, Jensen JM. The skin: An indispensable barrier. Exp Dermatol. 2008;17(12):1063–72. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008. 00786.x PubMed PMID: 19043850.
  39. Martin P. Wound Healing-Aiming for Perfect Skin Regeneration [Internet]. Report. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/
  40. Green H, Kehinde O, Thomas J. Growth of cultured human epidermal cells into multiple epithelia suitable for grafting. Cell Biology. 1979. Report.
  41. Zhang X, Xu W, Hu X. Tissue-engineered skin regenerative units for epidermal keratinocytes expansion and wound healing. Medical Science Monitor. 2021;27. doi:10.12659/MSM.932978 PubMed PMID: 34923566.
  42. Yamanaka S. Induced pluripotent stem cells: Past, present, and future. Cell Stem Cell. 2012. p. 678–84. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.005 PubMed PMID: 22704507.
  43. Appasani K, Appasani RK. Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine From Molecular Embryology to Tissue Engineering [Internet]. Report. Available from: http://www.springer.com/series/7896
  44. Finch PW, Rubin JS. Keratinocyte growth factor expression and its role in epithelial repair. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91(4):753–761.
  45. Ali G, Abdelalim EM. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into epidermal keratinocyte-like cells. STAR Protoc. 2022 Sep 16;3(3). doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101613 PubMed PMID: 35990735.
  46. Zhang L juan. Keratins in Skin Epidermal Development and Diseases. In: Keratin. IntechOpen; 2018. doi:10.5772/intechopen.79050
  47. Uddin A, Rahmani M, Sajini A. From basic biology to engineered therapies: the keratinocyte stem cell playbook. Frontiers in Medical Technology. Frontiers Media SA; 2026. doi:10.3389/fmedt.2026.1763067
  48. Wodarz A, Nusse R. Mechanisms Of Wnt Signaling In Development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol [Internet]. 1998. Report. Available from: http://www.stanford.edu/
  49. Koster MI. P63 in skin development and ectodermal dysplasias. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Nature Publishing Group; 2010. p. 2352–8. doi:10.1038/jid.2010.119 PubMed PMID: 20445549.
  50. Werner S. Keratinocyte Growth Factor: A Unique Player in Epithelial Repair Processes. Cytokine + Growth Factor Reviews. Report.
  51. Andrae J, Gallini R, Betsholtz C. Role of platelet-derived growth factors in physiology and medicine. Genes and Development. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2008. p. 1276–312. doi:10.1101/gad.1653708 PubMed PMID: 18483217.
  52. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. The fibroblast growth factor signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2015 May 1;4(3):215–66. doi:10.1002/wdev.176 PubMed PMID: 25772309.
  53. Kamel RA, Ong JF, Eriksson E, Junker JPE, Caterson EJ. Tissue engineering of skin. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Elsevier Inc.; 2013. p. 533–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.027
  54. Savage CR, Hash JH, Cohen S. Epidermal Growth Factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1973 Nov;248(22):7669–72. doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(19)43242-0
  55. Randall VA, Botchkareva N V. The Biology of Hair Growth. In: Cosmetic Applications of Laser and Light-Based Systems. Elsevier Inc.; 2009. p. 3–35. doi:10.1016/B978-0-8155-1572-2.50006-3
  56. Watt FM. Tanioku Kihei Memorial Lecture The stem cell compartment in human interfollicular epidermis. Journal of Dermatological Science [Internet]. 2002. Report. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/jdermsci
  57. Blanpain C, Fuchs E. Epidermal homeostasis: A balancing act of stem cells in the skin. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nature Publishing Group; 2009. p. 207–17. doi:10.1038/nrm2636 PubMed PMID: 19209183.
  58. Cotsarelis G. Epithelial stem cells: A folliculocentric view. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Nature Publishing Group; 2006. p. 1459–68. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700376 PubMed PMID: 16778814.
  59. Stem Cells: Units of Development, Review Units of Regeneration, and Units in Evolution. Report.
  60. Cable J, Fuchs E, Weissman I, Jasper H, Glass D, Rando TA, et al. Adult stem cells and regenerative medicine—a symposium report. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2020. p. 27–36. doi:10.1111/nyas.14243 PubMed PMID: 31655007.
  61. Kishimoto T. Interleukin-6: From basic science to medicine - 40 Years in immunology. Annual Review of Immunology. 2005. p. 1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115806 PubMed PMID: 15771564.
  62. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor: Basic science and clinical progress. Endocrine Reviews. 2004. p. 581–611. doi:10.1210/er.2003-0027 PubMed PMID: 15294883.
  63. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. Protein family review Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol [Internet]. 2001;2(3). Available from: http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005.1http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005
  64. Rittié L. Cellular mechanisms of skin repair in humans and other mammals. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling. Springer Netherlands; 2016. p. 103–20. doi:10.1007/s12079-016-0330-
  65. Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. Journal of Pathology. 2008. p. 199–210. doi:10.1002/path.2277 PubMed PMID: 18161745.
  66. Werner S. Keratinocyte growth factor: a unique player in epithelial repair processes. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1998;9(2):153–165.
  67. Reilkoff RA, Bucala R, Herzog EL. Fibrocytes: Emerging effector cells in chronic inflammation. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2011. p. 427–35. doi:10.1038/nri2990 PubMed PMID: 21597472.
  68. Schultz GS, Gary Sibbald ; R, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett ; Caroline, Harding ; Keith, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Report.
  69. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. Protein family review Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol [Internet]. 2001;2(3). Available from: http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005.1http://genomebiology.com/2001/2/3/reviews/3005
  70. Rittié L. Cellular mechanisms of skin repair in humans and other mammals. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling. Springer Netherlands; 2016. p. 103–20. doi:10.1007/s12079-016-0330-1
  71. Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. Journal of Pathology. 2008. p. 199–210. doi:10.1002/path.2277 PubMed PMID: 18161745.
  72. Barros NR, Kim HJ, Gouidie MJ, Lee KJ, Bandaru P, Banton EA, et al. Biofabrication of endothelial cell, dermal fibroblast, and multilayered keratinocyte layers for skin tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2021 Jul 1;13(3). doi:10.1088/1758-5090/aba503
  73. Koch L, Kuhn S, Sorg H, Gruene M, Schlie S, Gaebel R, et al. Laser Printing of Skin Cells and Human Stem Cells. Report.
  74. Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, Michael S, Gruene M, Coger V, et al. Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Jul;109(7):1855–63. doi:10.1002/bit.24455 PubMed PMID: 22328297.
  75. Koch L, Deiwick A, Schlie S, Michael S, Gruene M, Coger V, et al. Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Jul;109(7):1855–63. doi:10.1002/bit.24455 PubMed PMID: 22328297.
  76. Michael S, Sorg H, Peck CT, Koch L, Deiwick A, Chichkov B, et al. Tissue Engineered Skin Substitutes Created by Laser-Assisted Bioprinting Form Skin-Like Structures in the Dorsal Skin Fold Chamber in Mice. PLoS One. 2013 Mar 4;8(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057741 PubMed PMID: 23469227.
  77. Pereira RF, Sousa A, Barrias CC, Bayat A, Granja PL, Bártolo PJ. Advances in bioprinted cell-laden hydrogels for skin tissue engineering. Biomanufacturing Reviews. 2017 Dec;2(1). doi:10.1007/s40898-017-0003-8
  78. Huang Y, Zhang XF, Gao G, Yonezawa T, Cui X. 3D bioprinting and the current applications in tissue engineering. Biotechnology Journal. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2017. doi:10.1002/biot.201600734 PubMed PMID: 28675678.
  79. Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A. Vascularization and Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static Networks. Trends in Biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. p. 733–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002 PubMed PMID: 27032730.
  80. Rouwkema J, Khademhosseini A. Vascularization and Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static Networks. Trends in Biotechnology. Elsevier Ltd; 2016. p. 733–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.002 PubMed PMID: 27032730.
  81. Chaudhari AA, Vig K, Baganizi DR, Sahu R, Dixit S, Dennis V, et al. Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. MDPI AG; 2016. doi:10.3390/ijms17121974 PubMed PMID: 27898014.
  82. Yu JR, Navarro J, Coburn JC, Mahadik B, Molnar J, Holmes JH, et al. Current and Future Perspectives on Skin Tissue Engineering: Key Features of Biomedical Research, Translational Assessment, and Clinical Application. Advanced Healthcare Materials. Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2019. doi:10.1002/adhm.201801471 PubMed PMID: 30707508.

Photo
T. S. Shanmugarajan
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Sciences Technology And Advanced Studies (VISTAS) Pallavaram -600117 Chennai, Tamilnadu

Photo
R. V. Vaishnavi
Co-author

Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Sciences Technology And Advanced Studies (VISTAS) Pallavaram -600117 Chennai, Tamilnadu

R. V. Vaishnavi, T. S. Shanmugarajan*, Hydrogels in Skin Tissue Engineering: Future Developments and Applications, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19946668

More related articles
Optimizing Recovery After Stroke: A Multidisciplin...
Pallavolu Sravya, Abu Sufiyan, Dantu Lakshmi Sravani, P. Sailaja,...
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Self-Emul...
Abhinandan Satapathy, P. N. Tapaswini Behera, Sradhanjali Patra, ...
Formulation Development, Physicochemical Character...
Shubham Padol, Nikita Aware, Deepak Joshi, Swati Zade, Madhuri La...
Related Articles
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) of Antibiotic Use and Resistance Among...
Karan A. S., M. Senthilkumar, Loganantham, Mukesh V., Celcia S., Mohanapandiyan S., Fathimathul Nusa...
Review on Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles Using Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) Leaf Ext...
Mohini Avhad, Satyam Aute, Somnath Davkhar, Hemant Gangurade, ...
Optimizing Recovery After Stroke: A Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Perspective...
Pallavolu Sravya, Abu Sufiyan, Dantu Lakshmi Sravani, P. Sailaja, M. Bhargavi, Yadala Prapurna Chand...
More related articles
Optimizing Recovery After Stroke: A Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Perspective...
Pallavolu Sravya, Abu Sufiyan, Dantu Lakshmi Sravani, P. Sailaja, M. Bhargavi, Yadala Prapurna Chand...
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System o...
Abhinandan Satapathy, P. N. Tapaswini Behera, Sradhanjali Patra, ...
Formulation Development, Physicochemical Characterization, and In Vitro Evaluati...
Shubham Padol, Nikita Aware, Deepak Joshi, Swati Zade, Madhuri Landge, Ganesh Bansode, Sneha Vairagk...
Optimizing Recovery After Stroke: A Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Perspective...
Pallavolu Sravya, Abu Sufiyan, Dantu Lakshmi Sravani, P. Sailaja, M. Bhargavi, Yadala Prapurna Chand...
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System o...
Abhinandan Satapathy, P. N. Tapaswini Behera, Sradhanjali Patra, ...
Formulation Development, Physicochemical Characterization, and In Vitro Evaluati...
Shubham Padol, Nikita Aware, Deepak Joshi, Swati Zade, Madhuri Landge, Ganesh Bansode, Sneha Vairagk...